case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-17 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #2815 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2815 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[John Green]


__________________________________________________



04.
(Hemlock Grove)


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Russell Edwards' Naming Jack the Ripper]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Coronation Street]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Appropriation

(Anonymous) 2014-09-18 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
If it has major cultural or religious signficance. Like, pop culture is pretty much fair game.

'Sacrilege' is a word!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-18 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
And if people would say, "Hey, that's sacrilegious, don't be offensive," it would be clearer. "Appropriation" sounds like the sort of cross-pollination thing cultures do all the time.

Re: Appropriation

(Anonymous) 2014-09-18 10:08 am (UTC)(link)
Unless it has a major religious significance for Christianity, that one is fair game. Because Christianity is the root of all oppression in the world and you can't appropriate it. (Not lying, that's the thing I see over and over again when someone dares to complain that wearing rosaries and Christian iconography is appropriation as well.)