case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-17 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #2815 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2815 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[John Green]


__________________________________________________



04.
(Hemlock Grove)


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Russell Edwards' Naming Jack the Ripper]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Coronation Street]
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #402.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Scottish anons!

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-09-18 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
But what makes you think that the UK's "best ally" as you put it won't be willing to help out with this little problem? Either with funds to retrofit the harbour in Wales or by providing one of their own on loan? After all, they'd hate to "destabilize the region" and lose another nuclear power among their NATO allies.

Even worse, I could see our (Canadian) Conservative government using this dilemma to jump at the chance of getting their own nukes. We already buy the UK's shitty secondhand regular subs for our military, why not shitty secondhand nuclear ones? I'm sure Harper would be pleased as punch to let England rent one of our Atlantic habours, too.

Re: Scottish anons!

(Anonymous) 2014-09-18 01:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Why couldn't the UK lease the Scottish land and keep its nukes there?

The US had nuke bases in Europe for decades.
ariakas: (Default)

Re: Scottish anons!

[personal profile] ariakas 2014-09-18 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Is this not the same anon who's been talking to me? Isn't your whole premise that if Scotland succeeds in getting independence they'll oust the nukes due to citizen demand because no one wants them? That's why they "couldn't".