[ SECRET POST #2818 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2818 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OP

[diet_poison]

Hmm, ok. Yeah that is actually pretty different from what I like, so I guess our tastes don't line up that much. |D

Nothing wrong with your preferences, though. Different strokes and all that.

Most guys seem to want to be masculine unless they have, like a cross-dressing fetish or something.

There are guys who just are who they are, and happen to be masculine to some degree, and then there are guys who go out of their way to present as masculine as much as possible. The latter doesn't really appeal to me. But I'm not specifically attracted to guys who try to be feminine, either. I mean I guess what I'm saying is I don't think every given trait has to be "masculine" or "feminine". Some of them just...are there and part of someone without reading as one or other other.

I guess people have always told me I should be willing to give people a chance even if they don't seem right for me because "they might be really nice."

Yeah, that's a really annoying thing to keep hearing from people. It doesn't matter WHAT your tastes are, you're not obligated to give someone a chance just because they're "nice". If there's no chemistry there, you're doing a disservice both to yourself and to the other person.

Plus some of the preference has to do with looks, which is what people might consider shallow

Eh, like I said above? There has to be chemistry. Physical attraction IS part of what people look for in a partner and I don't think there's anything wrong with that. I guess sometimes it's shallow but I wouldn't automatically call it so - it depends on your overall attitude, I think.