case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-21 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2819 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2819 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [nf]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: What kind of meta do you like?

(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 08:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I vastly prefer people to phrase their meta as "what if...?" "can it be...?" "is it possible that...?" "Let's assume that..." and then list their speculations, along with alternative possible explanations.

Meta that's phrased as "This is what is happening here" really irritates me, even if I know that the writer is just putting down their opinions.

"This is what is happening here"-type speculation just works way better in fanfic than in meta essays.