case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-21 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2819 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2819 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [nf]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Just curious, why do you think they'd be better at Disney? I'm assuming you mean for the princesses? Not that I ever went to Disney as a kid but if I had, these would have terrified me.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Same here. They are way too uncanny valley for me.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-21 09:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm not sure they bother me exactly but having them on the princesses at Disney would be pretty awful. They can't change their expressions and who would want such dead eyes on their princesses? Talking to the children? ew.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-22 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
I can see how they might work in a stage show, where you only see them at a distance, but not as costumed characters that people get to get up close to. That's just going to terrify children. It also just wouldn't match the established Disney park character style. Even human characters with exaggerated facial features like the Mad Hatter are played by people without masks.