case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-21 03:28 pm

[ SECRET POST #2819 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2819 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [nf]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
arcadiaego: Grey, cartoon cat Pusheen being petted (Default)

[personal profile] arcadiaego 2014-09-22 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
That said, I think Gaiman's advice can be generalized in the sense that the questions a writer wants to ask are rarely as strange as they appear in the writer's head.

Also in that you don't always realise which obvious parts of knowledge (like putting everything in the right way round) you're missing until you actually say it out loud to someone. He probably wouldn't have googled that because he wouldn't have thought about it.
a_potato: (Default)

[personal profile] a_potato 2014-09-22 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
That's a really good point. When you're having a conversation or participating in what someone does, there are a lot of questions that flow from the interaction, and bits of information that kind of crop up organically, and you can't get that from a computer screen. You might miss some very vital pieces of the experience of doing something if you just stick to google.