Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-09-24 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2822 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2822 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Psycho-Pass]
__________________________________________________
03.

[LoadingReadyRun]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Ella Masar and Erin McLeod (NWSL)]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Hadaka Shitsuji]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Richard Armitage]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Arrow]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Stargate SG-1]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Outlander]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 027 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Rant Thread:
(Anonymous) 2014-09-24 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Rant Thread:
(Anonymous) 2014-09-24 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)I don't truly think it's as black and white as the facetious quip that I made above (or as the OP's original comment) but nor do I think that women should get 100% of the input and men can just get out.
That's why I feel that ideally, two people would discuss their opinions about the (possible) pregnancy situation before getting busy - and if you don't agree (e.g., one person would want an abortion but the other person wouldn't) then you probably shouldn't be having sex with each other.
Re: Rant Thread:
(Anonymous) 2014-09-25 12:10 am (UTC)(link)I do agree that the best scenario is when partners discuss these issues before sex, and only have sexwith people who share their views in that regard. Unfortunately people lie, change their minds, or fail to predict how they will react when they find themselves in the position. So the question becomes, who gets to make what decisions? I don't think the man should have veto power over what medical procedures are performed on the woman's body, obviously, so the final decision of whether to abort is ultimately hers. After that, if she carries to term, the question becomes, who is responsible for the child? I can see the argument for allowing the man to surrender his paternity rights and obligations, but on the other hand,now the interested parties are no longer just the man and woman - the child has a stake as well, and has the right to be provided for. The issue of how to balance the man's right to cede responsibilities against the child's right to be supported isn't as easy. I guess I don't really see it as man vs. woman, but rather man vs. kid.