case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-25 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2823 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2823 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: I'm in the process of plotting out a Hannibal fic

(Anonymous) 2014-09-25 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a curious thing, though, the idea that people could be searching for such information for perfectly legitimate reasons - research, writing, fan or otherwise - and yet create a mistaken online impression of having some *very* inappropriate, to say the least, interests.

Makes you wonder/fear how far anyone doing background checks actually bothers to consider the context of such things. How far can you go for accuracy when even asking the question potentially looks suspicious?

Re: I'm in the process of plotting out a Hannibal fic

(Anonymous) 2014-09-25 11:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh, I should rephrase that to sound slightly less paranoid - "when even asking the question MAY potentially look suspicious" - I've no experience with background checks, so I can't comment with any certainty, only speculate.