case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-25 06:30 pm

[ SECRET POST #2823 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2823 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #403.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
brightblueink: Stylized art of Varric from Dragon Age 2 (Varric art)

[personal profile] brightblueink 2014-09-26 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
The Bechdel test only tests for one VERY SPECIFIC form of sexism. Japanese anime tends to have more female characters in general, but there's a lot of female character-heavy genres that are specifically made to be geared toward men (harem, "moe" slice-of-life, ecchi, etc), and while those shows don't HAVE to be sexist a lot of them tend to have at least of undercurrent of sexism.

Plus, remember that the Bechdel test was made for movies, and a lot of anime consumed in the west is TV shows, which have a LOT more time to give even minor characters some dialogue that doesn't have to drive the plot home. Maybe two female characters have a discussion that doesn't have to do with a man in one episode, but that doesn't mean the other 10-25 episodes feature something like that.

I don't really know if anime or western media is better at portraying women, but I don't think the Bechdel test is necessarily a good measure of that.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-26 02:49 am (UTC)(link)
+1