case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-09-30 06:43 pm

[ SECRET POST #2828 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2828 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Wakfu]


__________________________________________________



03.
[rupaul's drag race]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Law and Order: Criminal Intent]


__________________________________________________



05.
[3-2-1 Contact: The Time Team]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Anna Popplewell, Reign]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The Strain]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Justice League]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Louisa May Alcott's Little Women]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #404.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-09-30 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I liked Jo, but everyone else bugged me. Especially Margaret, who took forever to grow out of that silly, vain teenage girl phase.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-09-30 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
They were all static characters, subservient to the men in their lives and utterly boring and self-righteous.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-01 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
If it makes you feel better, Louisa May Alcott didn't like the books either. She only wrote them because she needed the money, and "how to" books for young ladies were big back then.
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-01 11:43 am (UTC)(link)
It actually does make me feel a little better.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-01 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
I agree about the subservient part, but they definitely weren't static. Jo starts off as a very tomboyish, honest but unrefined and rather tactless. She becomes a more mature woman who at least knows how to behave properly in public without embarrassing her family and in the sequels ends up as a sort of Marmee 2.0. Amy transforms from being a spoiled brat to a more sensible (I'd even say TOO sensible since she gave up on art because she wasn't a genius) young woman. Margaret's journey is the least dramatic, I'll grant you that. Of all the daughters, she's the worst because she's held up as an example of the perfect docile wife and mother who's little more than a brood hen/ornament to her husband.

Now, what they became wasn't very interesting or all that impressive by modern standards, but there was definitely dynamic change.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-01 06:47 am (UTC)(link)
When was the last time you read the book? Did you ever really read the books?
iceyred: By singlestar1990 (Default)

[personal profile] iceyred 2014-10-01 11:44 am (UTC)(link)
I read the book when I was 15-16ish. I even read the sequels and hated them too. In my twenties my parents dragged me to a Christmas showing of the play. It still sucked.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-01 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

Fair enough. But I hope you'll take other peoples' word for it that they've got a more recent recall of the characters and while they're not great people, they're not all static and unchanging.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-01 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm wondering the same thing.