Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-10-12 03:37 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2840 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2840 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Natalie Dormer]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Star Trek: Voyager]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Justified]
__________________________________________________
05.

[The Fall]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Outlander]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Boxtrolls]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Scorpion]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Being Human (UK)]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 049 secrets from Secret Submission Post #406.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-12 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)That actually makes sense, though. I feel like this is one of those times where people here are so anti-SJW that they start being bigoted.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-12 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-12 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)Guy made up a persona to boost his male counterparts' claims that the box trolls were evil, ate children, stole cheese, etc. Literally, that's all she does. The men end up going all fanboy over her. There so much shit shoved onto this that isn't even there.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-12 11:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-13 12:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-13 12:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-13 12:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-12 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-13 12:16 am (UTC)(link)Oh my god! British humor! Run for the hills!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-13 12:52 am (UTC)(link)Oh no, what you say is true. That is definitely the reasoning for the crossdressing in the actual narrative. What I (and presumably the anon I originally replied to) meant is that, outside of in-story reasoning, crossdressing serves a function in hammering home that the antagonist is deceitful, or living a double-life, so to speak. Which, taking in the implications of the relation and comparing that to what's often associated negatively with the trans* community, lends credence to the idea that it's transphobic.
I'm aware of British humor, yes, but I don't humor should end all talk of a topic. That silences so many interesting discussions.