case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-10-13 07:03 pm

[ SECRET POST #2841 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2841 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 039 secrets from Secret Submission Post #406.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Based on #9

(Anonymous) 2014-10-14 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
DA

No idea, but I don't think it's necessarily a problem. Quite a few classics are "dated" in the sense that they're set relatively far back in history compared to the time period in which they're popular: Laura Ingalls Wilder's Little House series, Anne of Green Gables, Chronicles of Narnia, etc. Most of the books I read as a kid (which would've been in the 80s) were about times, cultures and places I had absolutely no clue about. I think kids are fairly open minded and accepting of the fact that stories are different like that.

The Great Brain books were pretty cute, as I recall. Lots of shenanigans about boyhood, siblings, and a kid who was maybe a little too smart for his own good. I think your nephew would be fine. :)