Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-10-16 06:35 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2844 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2844 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #406.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)DA
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 10:57 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Also, the logical response to "I can't read this" should not be "So let's hide it away somewhere so that it's unreadability is increased" Yanno?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)I mean, where are the bright line distinctions between what is and is not readable?
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-16 23:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-16 23:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
If Case couldn't read something, and he couldn't find anyone else who was able to read it, it'd be failbar'd anyway, but that's not a common occurrence (I don't think?).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-16 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Got through it, but it was much slower going that it aught to have been. Still I wouldn't say it's a reason to ditch it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-17 12:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-18 01:35 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-17 12:13 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-17 12:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-17 12:25 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-17 04:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I could see it if you had weird lighting I guess or issues with colors. But I've seen far, FAR worse.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-17 02:06 am (UTC)(link)it is a pain to read on mobile. It's readable, but not worth the effort.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-10-17 04:24 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-10-17 04:55 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Besides, if you're straining your eyes to read a secret, thereby working yourself towards a headache, that is so your own fault.