Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-10-28 06:42 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
[ SECRET POST #2856 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2856 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #408.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-10-28 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2014-10-28 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)OK frankly I don't see any of what your secret is saying about Silverberg, in those comments. (Did he edit himself?) Admittedly, I come down on the side of anti-censorship, here, no matter how odious the material attempting to be censored. The SJWs taking over fandom, especially semi-pro fandom, is what keeps me far, far, away from any fanac (excepting FS) these days, tbph with you.
I thought it was a professionally edited magazine for professional writers that is supposed to have content that is of use to the specific audience.
This blogger is kidding, right? It's a union rag, written by union members. Always has been. Any wonder they're frothing over the SJWs taking them to task. The cover notwithstanding. *eyes bookshelf* I take it you would be sorely displeased with the vast majority of the covers of my secondhand purchases, OP. Protip: The cover NEVER ever ever EVER had any bearing on what was inside, "back in the day." Think that's what they were referencing?
As to the content itself. Better that they open their mouths and show themselves fools, than be silenced, and no one is the wiser? <-- my two credits' worth.
OP
(Anonymous) 2014-10-29 12:37 am (UTC)(link)