case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-01 03:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2860 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2860 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 062 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-01 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
No one told anyone to kill themselves, etc, with it on. It should be on and people should be banned.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-01 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no one should be told to kill themselves, but case doesn't ban anyone, so what would it do?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-01 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
He could ban them if it got massively out of control. For instance, the anon hounding Dethtoll on the second page.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-01 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
He's stated that he won't because they also contribute to the community. :/

(Anonymous) 2014-11-01 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
IE they post stuff that isn't stalking or death threats

(Anonymous) 2014-11-01 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
The logical inference is that, having seen their IP addresses, Case knows that it must be another named user who also posts a lot of discussion points. We need to correlate named users who post around the same time as those threats.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-01 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
What? Logged in users are IP logged too now when it's on.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
Or it could be an anon that posts a lot of discussion points. Anons can contribute, too.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
more than logged in users, if comments are to go by

(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
haha, yes they have