case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-02 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2861 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2861 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: To the OP

(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Lots of people expressing disagreement isn't dogpiling.

For the love of fucking shit, what's wrong with you people? What do you think should happen: once a secret gets X number of comments that disagree, everyone else MUST post only agreeing comments?

(And yeah, I know you're not gonna respond to this but I'm posting it anyway, because this redefinition of dogpiling is stupid and insecure and childish. Own your fucking opinions and deal with it when people don't agree)

Re: To the OP

(Anonymous) 2014-11-02 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
A FUCKING MEN

Re: To the OP

(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
Depends. if they keep it to disagreeing with the opinion and refraining from rudeness when doing so, then it is fine. When they start attacking the person holding the opinion, then it crosses the line into bullying. We've seen that a lot in F!S recently. There have been a few dogpiles that have started out okay, objecting to an opinion, but crossed the line into personal attacks on the person holding that opinion. THat is when it is unpleasant to read, even moreso when the people doing the attacking cloak themselves in a personal shield of righteousness.

Re: To the OP

(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 02:15 am (UTC)(link)
The only attacks that are happening here are attacks against anons replying in thread. Everyone else is like, "huh, what?" Unless "what did Lana ever do to you" is an attack, now.

Re: To the OP

(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
I was meaning more in general and in past threads rather than this specific thread, apologies for being unclear.

Re: To the OP

(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 01:55 am (UTC)(link)
Word to your mother.