case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-02 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2861 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2861 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Case, in relation to the spoiler thread in GC yesterday...

(Anonymous) 2014-11-03 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
But figuring out whether a comment contains suicide encouragement, gore or sexually explicit content is a lot easier than figuring out if something's a spoiler. You're asking case to have an encyclopedic knowledge of every single fandom that appears on FS, including its chronology. It also assumes there's a general consensus on the statue of limitations for spoilers, and what the penalty should be, and how to enforce banning when it comes to people without signed accounts.

I don't disagree that it'd be nice to do something about trolls who post spoilers, but I'm not seeing where it's feasible to monitor the community to stop them beyond what case is doing now: acting as quickly as he can if/when alerted by the users.
kallanda_lee: (Default)

Re: Case, in relation to the spoiler thread in GC yesterday...

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2014-11-03 11:04 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not asking he has encyclopedic knowledge - just that if someone sees it happening, comes here and posts: "hey, case, this person is deliberately spoiling" that he considers doing something about it.

I'm not suggesting he wades through the comment looking for spoilers.