[ SECRET POST #2861 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2861 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

It does say a lot.

It's making me laugh, in fact. Romance is not literature!!!!

It's ingrained snootiness like this, even in Amazon's category divisions, that meant that I deliberately didn't read any novel marked romance for many years, believing romance to be a ridiculous, niche genre.

Perhaps they even do this deliberately, to make reading less threatening for a certain style of reader? At the same time, making other books by implication not-romance, they boost the snob factor of general literature, even though those books also probably contain romance in them.

Re: OP

[(Anonymous)]

To be fair, I think the separation may have more to do with the size of the genre than anything else. Mysteries and Sci-Fi/Fantasy gets their own category too.

However a look at the first page of Genre Fiction returns mostly romantic-centric books, so you have to wonder about the classification at all.

There still isn't anything close to "General Fiction". Which makes sense, because most fiction, barring avant-garde experimental stuff, is about something, so "General Fiction" in and of itself sounds like a nebulous misnomer.