Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-11-03 06:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #2862 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2862 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random textless image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(It's different for original fic, of course). To me, OC's should be there to flesh out the world or progress the story - but in the end, I want to read about my fav characters, not 20 paragraphs about an OC.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 01:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 03:05 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 03:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
In general I don't mind OCs in fanfic "fleshing out the world or progressing the story" -- but I don't want them center stage. I'm in a fandom because of the canon characters: they are the ones I want explored.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 01:20 am (UTC)(link)One type of oc I can't stand are children characters, especially if they're the offspring of official characters. I've never seen a fic where they were written decently, didn't annoy me or had a name that didn't make me want to facepalm.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 06:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 07:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)Before writing an OC I'd recommend all fanfic authors sit back and ask "is there a canon character that can carry this role?" if the answer is "yes" or "I just want to use an OC", then they are writing an author insert and should step away from the keyboard. Turns out, very few fanfics actually need an OC as a supporting character.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 01:21 am (UTC)(link)The OCs I like best are family OCs. For instance, I just read a story with Thranduil's extended family (wife, other kids, sister). That's the kind of thing I like.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 01:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 01:28 am (UTC)(link)I really don't like OC/main character of fic as a pairing though, but I can have OC/canon character as a background pairing, and honestly prefer that to "pair the spares".
But really, as long as the OCs doesn't take over the fic I don't really mind them. (Granted that they are well-written and feels real/fits the storyverse)
Re: OCs
My OC dislike list pretty much begins and ends with gun-users in settings that don't canonically have guns. They tend to be really obnoxious, and no one can question them by right of superior firepower.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 01:48 am (UTC)(link)But I think people too often ignore the potential for OCs in settings where they have a good reason to exist, like in a large community or group or something similar that the canon characters are already a part of, and so fics featuring only canon characters can feel really... insular or something, especially if the canon has a small cast to begin with. It's especially noticeable if it's for a TV show, where one-shot characters frequently appear anyway. I don't think they should take over the entire story or play the starring role, but I have no problem with a fic heavily featuring an OC if the other characters play equally large roles and are portrayed well. It can actually be a strong way of challenging or proving a character's canonical beliefs/viewpoint by presenting them with a perspective from the "outside."
...hope some of this is intelligible.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 02:32 am (UTC)(link)From a non-shipping perspective, though, OCs are also necessary in most fandoms. Unless your character lives in a bubble, stories need bodies.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 02:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 02:59 am (UTC)(link)Basically I like to see their design and whether it jives with the canon characters.
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 03:20 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 04:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 06:17 am (UTC)(link)OCs in gen and everything else are fine...but if they're having a major role that isn't romantic yet is central, I tend not to like it. Minor/secondary roles are fine, as long as either the Canon character is the focus of the story (unless, again it's specified it's going to be a romantic lead with an OC). I think it depends on the age of the OC. If the OC will have a big role, that is not necessarily romantic, I prefer an older (40s-60s) character. Sometimes contemporaries are okay. Flesh them out just right and OCs are wonderful additions to a story. I think it just depends on what the reader is looking for.
(Most of my fic is centered around OCs).
Re: OCs
(Anonymous) 2014-11-04 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)