[ SECRET POST #2862 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2862 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random textless image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[case]

Where?

ETA: Wait. Isn't Gone Girl the movie like a month old already? The book's been out for 2 and a half years.

Is this a joke?

[chardmonster]

Apparently it's its mekikio's.
http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/1106733.html?thread=791260461#cmt791260461

[case]

It says "Gone Girl rant" right in the comment subject, and mekkio is obviously not doing this in order to troll anyone. The official release date was October 3, 2014, and it's in the "Belated Fandom Talk" thread.

I can't tell if you're serious or not.

[(Anonymous)]

Told you Chard liked to troll and pick fights, but you froze the last thread.

[chardmonster]

I am serious.

I'm not trying to get anyone in trouble, here--I just think it's a good idea to collapse those things.

[(Anonymous)]

I wasn't planning on ever seeing it, but that thread did just spoil the movie for me.

[case]

This thread just brings back the same reasoning I had yesterday for not doing this at all. One person feels a subject header containing the movie title, a month after the US release date, is too little warning/too short a time for someone to be posting about the movie's plot. The poster would disagree with you, probably! As they feel a month is long enough for the fandom to be "Belated."

It breaks down into an argument about what the statute of limitations on a spoiler is yet again (and where, and to whom, and what counts as appropriate "warning"), and nobody can come to a consensus.

So I'm gonna go back to the same stance as yesterday. If it wasn't done for the purpose of trolling, and it doesn't seem to have been (movie title in the subject line is kind of a big giveaway as to what the post content is), I'm not going to delete it.

[(Anonymous)]

It's a movie based on a book.
People who read the book already know it and people who watched the movie already know it. There's nothing "new" to spoil there.

And people who plan to read the book or watch the movie can *gasp* not read that comment. Since the subject line is pretty clear about what it is, anyone reading it know they may get spoiled.

And people who don't want to watch the movie/read book probably don't care about it either way.

[(Anonymous)]

What's going on with you lately? It's like you're lashing out or something.

[(Anonymous)]

idk, but between this and her thinking that she has the moral authority to decalre that someone who makes the mistake of cheating once in a relationship is doomed to be a horrible cheater for like, the attitude is getting a bit old and I say this as someone whose never really had issues with Chard before

[(Anonymous)]

*like = life

*declare

[(Anonymous)]

yah, she's been super vocal lately about it too. i hate make assumptions about how her relationship with noodles went, but she's making it pretty hard not to.

[(Anonymous)]

It would have been easy for you not to make this comment. Which you wouldn't have done, if you really didn't want to.