[ SECRET POST #2862 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2862 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random textless image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

For it's definitely different than looking at a painting. A painting doesn't generally make me want to masturbate to it, unless it involves nude people in suggestive poses.

I think "voyeur" would be a more appropriate term than asexual for me, except voyeurs do want to have sex with at least some people, and I don't get off to secretely peeping on unsuspecting people. So maybe "asexual voyeur"? IDK, sexualities are hard to categorize.

[(Anonymous)]

Hmmm. Interesting.

For me it's definitely like a painting. If a good-looking person is around, I'll enjoy looking at them, and then when they leave I'll go back to doing whatever I was doing before. The idea of masturbating because of them never even occurs to me.

But for you, they are sexually arousing but you just don't want to act on it. You're right, that is a difficult thing to categorize.

Sexuality in general is confusing.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm like that. I've also seen it called 'lithsexual'. Not sure about it, but it's probably better than 'voyeur'.