[ SECRET POST #2862 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2862 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random textless image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Sherlock

[(Anonymous)]

I still don't think this in any way excuses "Sherlock". It may be faithful to the books (which a lot of "Sherlock" fans have not read, nor do I think they should be expected to) but that doesn't make it good story-telling. Especially as "Sherlock" only vaguely follows the books anyway. It's a different medium anyway.

Perhaps they could've found a way for Sherlock to have shot him and made it satisfying but I doubt it. As it is, they created a viscerally repellant villain and did not give the audience (in my opinion) a cathartic ending. Telling me that it's faithful to the books doesn't change the unfinished feeling I was left with when I watched the episode.