[ SECRET POST #2864 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2864 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 023 secrets from Secret Submission Post #409.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

You know that there's a good chance the pseudonym, leak and positive reviews from other crime writers was a publicity stunt, right? Many of the writers who praised Rowling's crime novel were her friends. Small world, eh? And the person who leaked the fact that it was Rowling was connected to someone in Rowling's legal firm.

My guess is she gave the pseudonym a go, found out that without all the fame of Harry Potter behind her very few people were interested, and then decided to out herself to save herself from humiliatingly low sales.

[(Anonymous)]

She sued the person who leaked it. Your bile is showing.

Rowling doesn't have to prove anything - she is one of the most successful authors of all time (OF ALL TIME, unironickanye.gif). What you are trying to prove, however, is unclear, besides your incredible capacity for bitterness.

[(Anonymous)]

They don't sound at all bitter, but you sound like a stan. It is possible to look at Rowling as just another author, in terms of quality at least.

[(Anonymous)]

+100

[(Anonymous)]

Anon was merely pointing out what was commonly spoken of at the time, so yeah. You sound like a stan. I'm sure Rowling appreciates you rushing to her defense, though.

[(Anonymous)]

She doesn't have to prove anything to the general public, that is true. However, I would be hesitant to completely deny her possibly wanting to prove something to herself. It's not unheard of that someone who's first outing gets super popular perhaps wonders if they would do just as well in another genre or under another pseudonym.

Then when they're disappointed, they go back to publishing/posting under their more famous name.

There are rarities that can pull off being bestsellers in different genres under different names (like Nora Roberts/J.D. Robb), but it's not easy or common, by any means.

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly. In her shoes, I would've been curious as well about whether or not I could succeed in a different genre, without the advantages of being a world famous author. I'd wonder if my work could stand well on its own, not because I needed to prove anything to the world, but because I'm personally curious.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh my God. This is just garbage. Publicity stunt, JKR, REALLY? Why would she *ever* need to pull such a thing? Really? Think about how stupid you sound.