case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-08 03:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #2867 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2867 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-09 03:37 am (UTC)(link)
Well, he's privileged by definition, being a straight white male with magic powers. But it seems like you're using the popular-wrong definition, meaning "This person has had a hella easy life so it's okay to hate them." I don't blame you for using that definition; it's dismayingly popular, especially in the endless one-upmanship games of fandom.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-09 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
Does being wizard-rich count as a privilege?
threeeyedsloth: (Default)

[personal profile] threeeyedsloth 2014-11-09 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
I think it does--it makes a difference with his relationship to Ron, after all. It's not an aspect he needs to worry about. As an adult Harry will never need to worry about how to provide for himself. This is important because of Ron, and his experience with poverty.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-09 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not a wrong definition. Words can mean multiple things, and considering that that was the original, non-social science meaning of the word, getting annoyed that people still use it is idiotic.

The thing that people like you have never gotten is you can't just redefine a word in a specific area of academia and then just expect everyone else to go along with it.