case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-08 03:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #2867 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2867 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 088 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - random image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is anyone here willing to admit

(Anonymous) 2014-11-09 04:52 am (UTC)(link)
Ehh, when actually dealing with the corruption discussion, it'd probably be best to have some sort of moderated place to do it. These are pretty serious topics, and people get really defensive about a lot of them - without moderation (i.e. on a fully open platform like twitter), it's not like it's really possible to have a constructive discussion about it. Advertorial content on youtube comes to mind as a hot-button topic, so do the dodgy press practices of everyone's favourite non-indie AAA publishers.

I'm just grateful as fuck that I don't use review scores or letsplays directly to inform my purchasing decisions so all this at least doesn't personally affect me.