[ SECRET POST #2870 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2870 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[X-Files]


__________________________________________________



03.
(Doctor Who/Torchwood)


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
(Benedict Cumberbatch)


__________________________________________________



06.
[Star Trek]


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
[Star Trek Voyager, "Macrocosm"]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Great British Bake Off series 4, Ruby Tandoh]


__________________________________________________



11.
[How to Get Away with Murder]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Far Cry 3]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Krazy Kat & Ignatz Mouse]











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[dazzledfirestar]

Have you ever noticed that even when a character is shown to be attracted to multiple genders, there's very rarely a label actually stated in canon about their orientation? They're "flexible" or suddenly gay or accused to be using their SO as a beard (i'm looking at HTGAWM right now but OITNB does it too). Relationship status has fuck all to do with orientation. Having a character say "I'm bi." should be enough.

But we can't even get that 99% of the time so... whatever.

If you don't feel it's needed, that's fine for you. Others disagree.