Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-11-13 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2872 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2872 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 01:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
No one is saying that's the sum total of the plot, but it's there... and Riku isn't presented as needing "saving," until after the Princesses have been rescued, he's presented as needing to be defeated, or redeemed.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 03:03 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
And a game can have a problematic element and still be quite good over all, and there's a lot wrong with the Princesses of Heart, as a thematic element.
Riku's story in II is also different, the needed to be found but he wasn't captured and used as an object in the same way.
Don't get me wrong, I love Kingdom Hearts and I'm not saying it's like "raaargh the most sexist thing ever," just there are a few things here and there that aren't quite so good, and of them happens to be a major focus of the first game.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 08:55 am (UTC)(link)His plotline is literally about being groomed so he can be possessed by the Big Bad, used as nothing more than a sack of meat that the Heartless King can use to move about. That is literally his plot in the first game.
no subject
And again Riku isn't a sack of meat being moved around, he had to choose to give into the darkness. Again I could make the same arguement about Darth Vader (the Emperor manipulated him), or Horus (chaos manipulated him), or Macbeth (the Weird Sisters and his wife manipulated him)... that doesn't take away responsibility for his actions.
And Re: Chain of Memories (if you want to get into the sequel territory), makes it pretty much clear that what happened to Riku was based on his wishes and desires, and that he is the captain of his own destiny.
Again that's where I make the distinction where Riku needs to be redeemed... Even though Ansem was in the driving seat, it was Riku's own actions that put him there.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)And no, Riku didn't need to give in. he never actually meant to give himself to Ansem. He was promised power--not to be the villain's chewtoy. Seriously, look at the scene again and tell me that Ansem was telling him that.
What happened was he was being told that Darkness = Power. So open your heart and you get power! ...Not someone using you like a fucking puppet.
And no, that. That was not the point of CoM at all. The point was that he felt guilty for something that he couldn't entirely control, and Zexion used that against him. In fact, as you see there, Ansem doesn't need permission to take over and one slip-up could see him doing it again.
no subject
Of course Riku wasn't told the cost of power... the tragic villains never are. Again you're ignoring the comparison to Darth Vader, and Horus... both of whom had their personalities drastically changed by an outside force (the Dark Side, or the Chaos Gods)... The point being though that he had to embrace the Darkside of his own free will, where Kairi is lugged around in a comma for half the game, then strapped into a big key machine.
"and one slip-up could see him doing it again."
Right, exactly! He could be tempted to give into the darkness, and loose control again. But there's still the element of choice there. The whole point of the game is that, he has the power to fight back, with the help of his friends. And eventually learn not to fear the darkness which seems to have been Ansem's real source of power.
The villains always lie about the cost of power in these stories, but falling to the dark side is not by any means as the the distressed damsel trope.
While we want to see Luke redeem Darth Vader, he was there because of choices Anakin made (even though the prophecy about Padme dying was self fulfilling, and the Emperor lied about adverting it.) It was still his choice.
Ansem lied about the cost of giving into the Darkness (even though Maleficent warned him earlier that he might loose himself), but he still made that choice.