Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-11-13 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2872 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2872 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 02:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 03:20 am (UTC)(link)Except the city elves are an apartheid group in a pretty well-off city, and most of them have jobs as servants, if at all. The man in question is the son of a lord of the city, and a right bastard. He has ALL the power over the elves, and could bring them down with a wave of his hand if he so pleased.
History shows that, time and again, with that power dynamic rapes happen. So it's not unimaginative, it's realistic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 06:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 07:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)They're kind of right though, if a bit extreme in the wording.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 03:28 pm (UTC)(link)No, no. They definitely are not even remotely right.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 06:39 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 06:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 11:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I will take your word that concerning Dragon Age, she took things a bit out of context. But are you really saying that there is no merit to any of what she says, sexism is dead, videogames are all A+ and address rape and assault in tasteful, thoughtful ways?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)woah woah woah when did I ever say that? I've been saying just the opposite! Where did you get that? Sexism IS a problem in video games, and rape depictions are offensive more often than not.
But Dragon Age is not sexist, and it is not inherently sexist to include rape in a plot. Let's talk about sexism in media, but there are plenty of examples to choose from that don't throw decidedly pro-feminist media under the bus, and detract from an argument that assumes any plot that might deal with, however respectfully, with rape must be sexist. (And yes, I will happily assert that the Dragon Age series is one of the most pro-feminist M rated RPGs out there.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-15 12:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-11-14 11:07 am (UTC)(link)I get the point that it can be exhausting to see it time and time again, but the suggestion seems to be that rape should never ever be used in fiction, which I think is untrue. I think it's worth bringing up games that overuse rape as a threat against women, especially taking into account how the female characters are treated overall. But I think it's useless to dismiss a game completely because it had one scene that dealt with rape, that doesn't represent the game's treatment of women even remotely.