case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-13 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2872 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2872 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ketita: (Default)

[personal profile] ketita 2014-11-14 08:59 am (UTC)(link)
tbh, it's not that I'm a huge fan of hers. I've seen some of these criticisms, and I agree that were we talking, say, academia, this stuff wouldn't really hold up. There's a lack of contextualization, for example, lack of nuance, etc.

If you have actual examples I would be interested in hearing, but enough with the slogans. I did read the thread, and I saw some examples that people (like ariakas) gave for how she presents thing in a misleading fashion, and the criticism is valid. My argument is that jumping from flawed technique to "she is a liar, believe nothing" sounds to me like you're just trying to shut down the conversation about women in video games.