[ SECRET POST #2872 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2872 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Except, its more like you did that awesome game, and then found out that someone was using it to illustrate the concept of, say, a penalty kick, or crappy defense.

While I can get the actual LPers being put out by her use, she wasn't getting attention or money for playing the games. She was getting it for the commentary about what the games were showing - things which do not change no matter who actually played the game.

I mean, if the worst indictment most people can make about her points is that she didn't use her own footage (which isn't actually an indictment of her points) or that she's wrong because there *reasons* in the individual games (a point which she addresses early on - that each game has an excuse for the trope does not negate the preponderance of the use of that trope), it really does make me eye-roll at the sheer vitrol.