case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-13 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2872 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2872 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 019 secrets from Secret Submission Post #410.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Aw shit

(Anonymous) 2014-11-15 02:53 am (UTC)(link)
It's not a great pile of evidence, it's just an example of how you have too much time on your hands, apparently.

For instance "pro-GamerGate being terrible people" you can include four or five links, of what?

I could dig up the same amount of links or double, triple, if I wanted to, and have "evidence" that anti-gamergaters are horrible people. How about the guy that called a black GGer a member of the KKK, the people that doxxed GGers, the person that attacked GGers family and friends, calling their girlfriend (who had nothing to do with anything GG) a fat whore?

Is that "evidence"? Evidence of what? That every movement and group has a few shitheads in it?