Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-11-15 03:33 pm
[ SECRET POST #2874 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2874 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 074 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 4 - random images ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Also, the fact that it speaks to one sort of power, or one sort of consequence of confidence, does not mean that it's denying any other source of power. And while it's definitely true that women definitely tend to be reduced to their sexuality, and it's also true that that's a problem, the answer isn't to brush aside or stop acknowledging the power of sexuality -- it's to add other sources of power to it. It's not, and shouldn't be, a zero-sum game.
I'd also note that your version with the roles reversed doesn't actually sound ridiculous at all, because men do derive power from being able to attract women. The fantasy of women falling all over themselves to get a particular man pops up constantly in fiction, and it's something that a lot of men aspire to.
no subject
no subject