case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-16 03:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2875 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2875 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: what is the point of adaptations that don't change up the source material a lot

(Anonymous) 2014-11-16 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I actually enjoy adaptations that go in a different direction. My understanding of people who don't is that they feel the integrity of the characters has been ruined somehow or that the storyline has been changed. Now for the most part this can be subjective, but occasionally there are terrible adaptations that do absolutely nothing good for the source material as a franchise. For example, the Dragonball Z movie bombed because it was a bad movie and totally different from the original story, characters etc. But even then you'll have people who still appreciate it for what it was. The more in love you are with a character or story, the more attached you will be to it and will notice even subtle changes in adaptations.