case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-16 03:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2875 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2875 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ketita: (Default)

Re: what is the point of adaptations that don't change up the source material a lot

[personal profile] ketita 2014-11-16 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that it boils down to 'saying something new' about the source material, like OP said. Going off in a random direction isn't really saying anything new, because it's disconnected from the source material. A good adaptation should give you a new perspective on the source material, and ideally make you think about it more. Those are the most difficult adaptations to do (and btw, I think Wicked fails at that too).