case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-16 03:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2875 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2875 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-17 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
I strongly, strongly doubt it. I mean, if that were the case, no one would make anything - if nothing else, the fact is that most studios are very well adapted to the business model of paying to make something and then monetizing it. Like, if you're capable of investing the money to create a show and have the means to monetize it, you would always prefer to make the show yourself, and that is what studios do. And there's just so many means of monetizing it, you know?

(Anonymous) 2014-11-17 09:06 am (UTC)(link)
It's what most tv channels in Europe do. Broadcast whatever popular thing America has cheaply get all of the advertising money and something you are sure is hit without the effort of making something yourself. And you can use the sure hits to advertise your own programmes that you can monetize.