case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-16 03:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2875 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2875 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
greenvelvetcake: (Default)

Re: what is the point of adaptations that don't change up the source material a lot

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake 2014-11-17 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Is that only if they're in the same medium? I like very close adaptations with different mediums; there are some things unique books/movies/TV shows/whatever that can't be caught by the others. The problem is, they're so easy to fuck up.

Re: what is the point of adaptations that don't change up the source material a lot

(Anonymous) 2014-11-17 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
No. If I want to see a movie of something, I don't want it to be exactly like the book. Otherwise, I'd go read the book. People still won't be interested in the book just because they saw a movie that was exactly the same as it.