case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-20 06:44 pm

[ SECRET POST #2879 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2879 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 017 secrets from Secret Submission Post #411.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-21 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
I would complain about both. It's been thousands of years of men getting theirs while our desires go ignored. I think it only fair that men be denied their objects of lust while we get all up in their junk.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-21 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
This!

(Anonymous) 2014-11-21 06:12 am (UTC)(link)
Nope. "Denying" men scantily clad women in art and fiction doesn't make up for the lack of scantily clad women. It won't change the past, and trying to say "it's only fair!!" is reductive. Shoot for the parity you want, not a reversal of what you don't want.

(Anonymous) 2014-11-21 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
You know what happens when the pendulum swings too far in one direction like that? People get pissed, and overcorrect again. It's happening with custody of children right now.