case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-11-23 03:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #2882 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2882 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 061 secrets from Secret Submission Post #412.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dreemyweird: (austere)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2014-11-23 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I think I can get behind 2. Okay, I think I could even get behind 3 - at least in that if the show were any good, Sherlolly could be played as a meaningful and interesting development. Yes, I guess the issue here is more that the show is already bad and incapable of good plot developments.

Tbh in the end I have to agree, sort of. I suppose my initial reaction was mostly due to the fact that any incarnation of Holmes being in a romantic relationship with a woman just completely throws me off. I want to see Sherlock as an aromantic-asexual, too, but the creators have ruined this for me, so Sherlolly would probably not make it worse.