[ SECRET POST #2884 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2884 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #412.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Well put, that's how it goes, IME. The argument gets a little tiresome as a whole but I hope that writers take away the significant bits: POCs were/are everywhere, feel free to include them if you want.

The problem is that "but-but historical accuracy!" is often used as an excuse for why you can't possibly have POCs in a setting, and then people enter into some sort of weird Justify My White Characters Olympics where they try to come up with scenarios where there were definitely no POCs. Geez, why bother? If you want to write all white characters, do it. No need to pull up "evidence" to prove why that's justified. But also, realize that there are very, very few situations where POCs didn't exist and could not possibly exist in the context of a fictional story, so just let that argument die.