[ SECRET POST #2888 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2888 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #413.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 (rape) - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[(Anonymous)]

That's a completely fair point, with the qualification that I think you could make more or less the same point about most of the genres that are out there - certainly about SF&F and mystery.

So I would stand by the idea that YA is a genre - but you're right in that it's probably a good idea to be pretty relaxed about what that means, and to understand it pretty loosely.

Re: Is there any instance where YA fiction is better than critically acclaimed classics?

[diet_poison]

I don't think YA is as unified as a category than SFF, mystery, nonfiction, etc. but at that point it's all relative, I guess.