Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-12-08 06:53 pm
[ SECRET POST #2897 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2897 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #414.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-09 01:26 am (UTC)(link)I mean I get the whole 'look if the setting is present day and diverse, it looks really weird when the main cast is all like precisely one type of person with minor variations' and the problematic aspects of that make sense to me. But SHOEHORNING THE TOKEN SPARKLY MINOR RACE OR SEXUALITY in doesn't actually fix the problem because what happens is that they end up being defined ALMOST ENTIRELY by their race or whatever which is just a big huge no. It's better to me if it's just not addressed, you can just be like 'yes we see that's a question, but it's not one we're aiming to tackle at this point in time'. I'd be totally cool with that!