case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-08 06:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2897 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2897 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 041 secrets from Secret Submission Post #414.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-09 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
His tutor is hardly a reliable source, the man was well known to be extremely strict, overly critical, and humorless. He said much the same about George.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-09 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
Well, obviously you know Prince Eddy's true capabilities and temperament than his own personal tutor so all your assertions seem 100% legit.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-09 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
*eye roll*

Here's the documentary.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUOnX2IDBk8

(Anonymous) 2014-12-09 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh well, if a documentary says so then that debate's over. In other exciting news, werewolves are real:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBojyMYHwbM&index=10&list=WL

And if werewolves had ruled England, they probably would've saved the Romanovs, too.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-10 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
And I suppose the testimony of Eddy's Cambridge tutor citing how he barely knew what the meaning of "to read" was, is also suspect? Weird how both his childhood and his university instructors had such negative reports to make of his abilities.

So far, I'm not seeing the leap between "unfairly criticized" ---> "would've saved the Romanovs". That's not a logical progression at all, and everyone but you seems to grasp this. Even that documentary you cite is more about absolving Eddy of the Cleveland Street Scandal and the Jack the Ripper killings, two reasons nobody in this thread has brought up (except for your own strawmen arguments) as a reason why he wouldn't have been a great king.