case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-09 06:48 pm

[ SECRET POST #2898 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2898 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Daphne du Maurier's "Rebecca", 1979 vs. 1997]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Captain America: The Winter Soldier]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Double Indemnity]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Big Hero 6]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Statler and Waldorf; The Muppet Show]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Ashita Dorobou]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Beth, from the Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



09.
[How to Get Away with Murder]










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #414.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: "Bad" movies you liked anyway

(Anonymous) 2014-12-10 01:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought we didn't talk about that?

I never saw it on first release, but I did watch it recently on dvd at a friend's place. The movie failed to hold my attention, apart from the obligatory meme, but that was completely unrelated to any marketing. It just seemed pointlessly bleak to me. However, if it's marketing and publicity promised one type of movie and it was not that kind of movie; or if the marketing and publicity led people to think the movie was about something totally different, then yes, I would have had a special hell ready for it.

In any other industry advertising one thing but delivering another is called fraud. I fail to see why movies should get a special exemption from that.