[ SECRET POST #2902 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2902 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Whatever, punk.

I'm both very seriously leftist and pretty seriously pro-file-sharing; but I don't think, "all art and property should be free," the way you're saying.

Property should be publicly regulated for the public good (health, environmental issues, sustainability). That certainly isn't "free."

Artists would benefit from a higher general level of disposable income. If you can raise ral median incomes, and share profits more broadly, there can be money that can go to the arts. If real median incomes are dropping and/or costs of energy and necessities are rising, the arts suffer.

*real median incomes

[(Anonymous)]

sorry for the typo