case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-13 03:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2902 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2902 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-14 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
na

a lot of that art is made by people who died long, long ago and probably had little concept of intellectual property and certainly no copy rights and the art from living people is used with permission. it's not really a good comparison

(Anonymous) 2014-12-14 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
Their problem with fanart is that they see it as people riding the coattails of someone else's success.

A good degree of famous art of religious figures, of even present-day writing with deities, is riding on the coattails of the success of that religion (see: angels and demons from Christianity, Greek gods, etc) by that same argument.

I'm showing them how ridiculous their argument is.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-14 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
So, what specific person's intellectual property rights are being violated by the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel? You need to provide actual names of injured parties here, because otherwise you're only making a fool of yourself. That's not even an apples to oranges comparison. More like apples to socks.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-14 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
...You realize the Sistine Chapel was... Forcibly commissioned, right? Michelangelo was PAID for that.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-14 05:44 am (UTC)(link)
And who's intellectually property was he stealing by taking the commission? You know, because taking a commission to paint a chapel ceiling with subversive God stuff is exactly like taking a commission to paint Destiel wing porn.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-14 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
Except no one was getting famous off their originally created Old Testament character. God doesn't get royalty checks.

Because the language of religion and arts during these times meant something vastly different than seeing two anime boys fucking.