[ SECRET POST #2904 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2904 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #415.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Which appears to be some other world than this one. I mean, seriously you think this? The evidence is overwhelming that porn serves the male gaze in the vast majority of cases.

[(Anonymous)]

Not PP, but the problem with "male gaze" is that it is not clearly defined, and has no counterpart. Everything can be male-gaze. As a bisexual, mostly into women, I've been told that I have just internalized a male gaze when I'm turned on by a scenario with a sexy woman. But maybe it's just what I like. Problem: there is no such thing as a "female gaze" except as the negative image of what 'men want', alledgedly. I refuse to let my desires be pressed into what male desires have left over for "us". So just don't go claiming there's evidence when you can't even define the object you're talking about.