[ SECRET POST #2910 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2910 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 055 secrets from Secret Submission Post #416.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: "Realistic" Dolls

[(Anonymous)]

WTF happened to you as a child that you thought a doll being proportional was "boring" and that you wouldn't have wanted to play with it?

I cared about my dolls having hair that I could brush, lots of outfits that I could dress them in, and lots of playscapes. I couldn't have given two shits if they looked like the Barbie on the left or the Barbie on the right. The only time I thought a doll was "superior" was when they came out with the gymnast Barbie that had actual jointed legs. The thing that made her "not boring" wasn't that she had big boobs and an itty bitty waist, it was that her limbs could actually, you know, bend.

You can't speak for every kid. And also, I think there was something fucked up with you if you would've refused to play with a doll for having a normal waistline.