[ SECRET POST #2914 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2914 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Eureka]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Amazing Spider Man]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Masterchef Season 5]


__________________________________________________



05.
[American Horror Story: Murder House]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 017 secrets from Secret Submission Post #416.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Some people are actually old enough to have lived through significant world events and might have more insight then someone who read about an event on Wikipedia. The internet doesn't make everyone an instant expert.

[(Anonymous)]

This.

[(Anonymous)]

They might have more insight but they also have intense biases both emotional and otherwise. I really hesitate to give examples just because they're intrinsically so controversial. But take the conflict between Israel and Palestine - someone who has lived through that in the Israeli side might have totally different biases than a Palestinian who lived through it. And yet despite their diametrically opposed accounts both could cite the authority of experience. So my point is that first hand accounts are tricky.

[(Anonymous)]

da

They might have more insight but they also have intense biases both emotional and otherwise.

Then so would the person leaving the 'concrit' and that wouldn't automatically mean they were right either.

[(Anonymous)]

Sure, I can agree with that.

[(Anonymous)]

But people can feel strongly about something and have emotional bias, and still be correct.

[(Anonymous)]

I accept that. I'm just somewhat skeptical of the value of claims like that, at this point.

[(Anonymous)]

Being dismissive of someone's account because it's one side of a story is a bias in itself.

[(Anonymous)]

That's... fair, I guess? But I'm not sure how useful it is. I would like to think of it as healthy skepticism more than anything.