case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-12-25 07:13 pm

[ SECRET POST #2914 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2914 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Eureka]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Amazing Spider Man]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Masterchef Season 5]


__________________________________________________



05.
[American Horror Story: Murder House]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 017 secrets from Secret Submission Post #416.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-12-26 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
This happens all the time. (And the more shouty and emphatic the "con-critter" is, the more likely they are to be wrong, IME)

Just because it's crit doesn't mean it inherently deserves to be taken seriously. It needs to be evaluated on its merits just like everything else, and Sturgeon's Law is in effect there as well.