Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-12-27 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2916 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2916 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 050 secrets from Secret Submission Post #417.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (second time) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Besides, the two types of transactions are hardly comparable, at least as long as we are talking middle-class people. The amount of money you lose if you buy a bad car is just so much more than the amount you lose if you hire an ineffective editor.
It is not an invalid concern. If the OP's friend were in a good financial situation and were simply seeking to sell their services because they wanted more money, I'd understand OP's worries perfectly well. But the friend in question needs the money to pay their medical bills. I think there may be something wrong with the OP's priorities.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-27 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)It's also worth noting that the concept of fairness is not attached to a specific dollar amount. If I buy a candy bar and it turns out to be a piece of chocolate coated plywood, that's still not a fair transaction. It doesn't matter that I'm out a dollar vs. out thousands of dollars.
no subject
For what it's worth, though, I think that the law covers the majority of the truly unacceptable cases and that the OP's friend's activities aren't anything that could be said to be horribly wrong (morality-wise). But that is, of course, subjective.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-27 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-28 04:58 am (UTC)(link)"...but one is less nice than the other..."
Nah. You can't really use that as a justification because any number of rotten things are better than not having the money to pay your medical bills, including robbing senior citizens or check fraud. If I have to have saltines and mayonnaise for dinner because I have no money for food, that's not nice... but it doesn't justify sneaking into someone else's house and taking their flatscreen TV so I can pawn it for grocery money.
"They aren't even trying to deceive people on purpose."
I agree. It's too bad that having good intentions doesn't really make the end result (a poorly edited fic someone paid for) any less bad, though.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-12-28 04:27 pm (UTC)(link)